Legal Opinion

Atwood Agency v. Black

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 25, 2007No. 26348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

This appeal is from a temporary injunction1 issued in an action brought by respondent Atwood Agency (Atwood) alleging that appellant Elaine Shaw misappropriated trade secrets when she left its employ. We reverse.

FACTS

Atwood is a vacation rental business on Edisto Islánd that matches homeowners (rental property owners) with renters (those seeking vacation accommodations). Shaw worked for Atwood as a property manager from 1990 until August 26, *712005, when she left and began work for another vacation rental agency, Edisto Sales and Rental Realty, Inc. (Edisto Sales). Shaw’s job…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Gilley v. GilleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Compton v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Spartanburg Buddhist Center v. OrkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Atwood Agency v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Greenville Bistro, LLC. v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021
  5. Jennings-Dill, Inc. v. Eric IsraelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API