Legal Opinion

Phoenix Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Chrysler Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1975No. KCD 27071PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

This suit arises out of a fire occurring in a restaurant owned by Arch and Mae E. Pollock. Phoenix paid a portion of the fire loss and upon subrogation brought this action against Chrysler (the manufacturer) and the Reeds (the installers) of a furnace allegedly the causative agency of the fire. The evidence was heard by the court without a jury and, upon a finding for all defendants, Phoenix appeals.

Phoenix contends under three points that the trial court judgment is in error: first, that the trial court erred in its determination that the cause of the fire could not be fixed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Dill v. Poindexter Tile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Bates v. Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Lappin v. PrebeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Fritz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. C_ L_ R v. L_ B_ RMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. R.J. Reagan Co. v. Kent, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  3. W & S Investment Co. v. MushrushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Dickson v. DicksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Majors v. ButnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API