Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Brady

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*234OPINION OF THE COURT

Leonard N. Cohen, J.

Respondent moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 2221, granting leave to renew and reargue the decision of this court dated November 23, 1988 (141 Mise 2d 882), as modified by this court’s order dated December 21, 1988. This court grants leave to renew and reargue but, upon renewal and reargument, this court adheres to its original decision.

To the extent that movant seeks renewal, he has failed to show the existence of any additional material facts which existed at the time' the prior motion was made, but were not then known to him (Foley v Roche, 68…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Rubino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  2. Abrams v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API