Legal Opinion

Pelella v. Pelella

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1992No. 91-2931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Nostrand v. OlivieriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Decker v. HunterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Hess v. HessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Narcisi v. BruskoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jh v. RbSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API