Legal Opinion
Mayuyo v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided June 2, 2017No. 2556 A-11786PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Judge MANNHEIMER,
writing for the Court.
Diego Bantay Mayuyo appeals his conviction for first-degree sexual assault. He argues that the trial judge committed error by (1) allowing the State to introduce an altered version of a statement that Mayuyo made to his roommate shortly after the alleged sexual assault, and by (2) prohibiting Mayuyo’s attorney from cross-examining the roommate about the alteration in the statement. Mayu-yo contends that the altered version of his out-of-court statement was substantially misleading (in a manner unfavorable to him), and that his trial was unfair…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Farrell v. Board of Com'rs, Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Pease v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charlie Willie Steven v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023