Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Taylor

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. Lee Thornton, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The question presented in this record is, Can a decree be entered in favor of the complainant in a cross bill, leaving the case made by the original bill undisposed of, because at the time not ready for trial ?

If the present case, was as it is assumed in ar*452gument to be — that is, one where the Chancellor, in advance of the preparation of the original cause and independent of it, had taken up the cross bill and entered a decree upon it — we would regard it as unsound practice, and so the subject of reprobation. But such is not. the fact. The decree recites that the cause came on for hearing on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayres v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Cross v. De ValleSupreme Court of the United States · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. Owens Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  2. Combustion Fuel Oil Burner Co. v. Memphis Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API