Legal Opinion

Sonitrol of Maricopa County, Inc. v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Tax Court

Decided April 26, 1993No. TX 91-00106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHAFER, Judge.

This case was brought by Taxpayers Sonitrol of Maricopa County and CSG Security Services, Inc. to recover privilege taxes imposed on their income from monitoring security alarm systems. The Taxpayers sell, install, service, and monitor security alarm systems for customers in Phoenix and other areas of the state in both commercial and residential buildings. Both Taxpayers monitor their customers’ alarm systems from stations in Phoenix. When an alarm system is triggered, a signal is transmitted on a telephone line to one of the stations. The station then contacts the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Flagstaff Vending Co. v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sonitrol of Maricopa County v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API