Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vargas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1982No. Appeal No. 460PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was afforded effective assistance of trial counsel. If the court determines that there were no reasonable grounds for counsel’s actions designed to effectuate appellant’s interests, see Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 235 A.2d 349 (1967), an order shall be entered granting appellant a new trial. If it is determined that trial counsel’s representation was effective, the judgment of sentence shall be reinstated. The parties may appeal the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. BrunnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API