Commonwealth v. Vargas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was afforded effective assistance of trial counsel. If the court determines that there were no reasonable grounds for counsel’s actions designed to effectuate appellant’s interests, see Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 235 A.2d 349 (1967), an order shall be entered granting appellant a new trial. If it is determined that trial counsel’s representation was effective, the judgment of sentence shall be reinstated. The parties may appeal the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. BrunnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983