Garrett v. Garrett's Heirs
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Chambers. Heard before the Hon. James B. Claek. The opinion of the court contains a full statement of all the facts deemed material to a correct understanding of the points decided.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The bill alleges that, in 1885, the complainant and John Garrett formed a partnership in merchandising, by the terms of which, John Garrett was to purchase the goods in his own name, and with his own credit and means, and the complainant was to sell the goods, and to attend to the active duties of the business ; and the two were to share equally the profits. It is farther alleged, that John Garrett purchased the goods, and the complainant sold them, and carried on the business, in pursuance to the agreement, for some time with profit and success ; that John Garrett speculated in Indian lands,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bryan v. CowartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Brandon v. CabinessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Conner v. TuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Petty v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
3Cited by12 opinions
- Preston & Stetson v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Tilford v. Torrey & LockwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
- Wittick's Adm'r v. KeifferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Lee v. BrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.