Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brenda Sheats v. the Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 21, 2016No. A15A2073, A15A2074Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAndrews, Presiding Judge

1. Under established Georgia law,

[i]t is the general rule that a vendor or dealer who is not the manufacturer is under no obligation to test an article purchased and sold by him for the purpose of discovering latent or concealed defects, but that when he purchases and sells an article in common and general use, in the usual course of trade, without knowledge of its dangerous quality, and with nothing tending reasonably to call his attention thereto, he is not negligent in failing to exercise care to determine whether it is dangerous or not. In such a case he may assume that the manufacturer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Phillips v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Davis v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Sirmons v. Derst Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Brock v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API