Coren v. DiDomenico

I believe we should not quash the appeal but should reach the merits, and on the merits, remand for further findings of fact.

1

The action is in assumpsit to recover damages for breach of an agreement of sale. The case was tried by a judge sitting without a jury. On November 8, 1979, the judge entered a finding in favor of appellees and against appellants in the amount of $18,321. Appellants filed exceptions, *334and on February 29, 1980, the lower court, by the judge who had been the trial judge, entered an order dismissing appellants’ exceptions and stating that “[t]he Award entered by this Court…