Legal Opinion

King's Medical Supply, Inc. v. Hereford Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 20, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover first-party no-fault benefits for medical supplies provided to its assignor. Thereafter, plaintiff moved for summary judgment in the amount of $980, which motion was denied by order entered September 10, 2003.

Contrary to the determination of the court below, plaintiffs billing manager did not have to allege in his supporting affidavit that he had personal knowledge that the equipment was furnished to plaintiffs assignor. Said affidavit set forth the billing manager’s duties so as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Mary Immaculate Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API