Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Parrish v. Allison

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 2007No. 4322Published

1ConcurrenceShort, J.

I concur with the majority that the judgment must be reversed based on the trial court’s error in allowing Allison to assei't truth, even though he did not affirmatively plead truth as a defense. I write separately, however, because I believe *329the trial court also erred in failing to direct a verdict on the issue of slander per se.

In light of the attendant circumstances, I find Allison’s statements charged Parrish with the commission of a crime of moral turpitude. See Flowers v. Price, 192 S.C. 373, 378, 6 S.E.2d 750, 752 (1940) (considering extrinsic circumstances to determine if words are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herring v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Flowers v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Carruth v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Porter v. News and Courier Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API