Gregory v. Ashcroft
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice White
I agree with the majority that neither the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) nor the Equal Protection Clause prohibits Missouri’s mandatory retirement provision as applied to petitioners, and I therefore concur in the judgment and in Parts I and III of the majority’s opinion. I cannot agree, however, with the majority’s reasoning in Part II of its opinion, which ignores several areas of well-established precedent and announces a rule that is likely to prove both unwise and infeasible. That the majority’s analysis in Part II is completely unnecessary to the proper resolution…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.