Legal Opinion

Armando Romero v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1986No. 85-2153PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Armando Romero appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his suit challenging the constitutionality of the “tax intercept” statute. See 26 U.S.C. § 6402(c), 42 U.S.C. § 664. Romero sought to recover his tax refund for 1981, which was paid by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to California pursuant to these provisions, for past-due child support after the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) certified to the IRS that Romero owed such payments. In his amended complaint, Romero charged that section 6402(c) authorized the IRS to engage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ferdinand Henry Schutten v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Nelson v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Mallette Bros. Construction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Mikulay Co. v. Urban Mass Transportation AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Milwaukee County Pavers Assoc. v. FiedlerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API