Benford v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of misdemeanor ;• from city court of Dublin — Judge Hicks. November 15, 1915.
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, O. J.
1. As a general rule, the trial judge may excuse jurors for any reason addressed to his sound discretion; but he can not excuse a member of a regularly drawn and summoned jury unless he has some legal excuse. (Judge v. State, 8 Ga. 173; Ellis v. State, 114 Ga. 36, *1539 S. E. 881); and excusing such a juror in a criminal case, over the timely objection of the defendant, may require the grant of a new trial. Cunneen v. State, 96 Ga. 406 (23 S. E. 412); Cochran v. State, 113 Ga. 736 (39 S. E. 337). Still, in the present case, under the recitals of the trial judge in his explanatory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Judge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- Cunneen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Hargroves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.