Legal Opinion

Benford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1916No. 7111PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor ;• from city court of Dublin — Judge Hicks. November 15, 1915.

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, O. J.

1. As a general rule, the trial judge may excuse jurors for any reason addressed to his sound discretion; but he can not excuse a member of a regularly drawn and summoned jury unless he has some legal excuse. (Judge v. State, 8 Ga. 173; Ellis v. State, 114 Ga. 36, *1539 S. E. 881); and excusing such a juror in a criminal case, over the timely objection of the defendant, may require the grant of a new trial. Cunneen v. State, 96 Ga. 406 (23 S. E. 412); Cochran v. State, 113 Ga. 736 (39 S. E. 337). Still, in the present case, under the recitals of the trial judge in his explanatory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Judge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  3. Cunneen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Hargroves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API