Legal Opinion

Climber Motor Corp. v. Fore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1925No. 3072PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts- as above.) The appellant moved for a judgment in its favor on the findings of the jury, and the court overruled the motion. The evidence in the case is practically uhdisputed, and the jury verdict merely reflects, the admitted facts. The salient facts, admittedly shown, are here stated. The Climber Motor Company was the owner of the 15 automobiles in suit, and R. M. Fore was its special agent for the purpose only of effecting a sale thereof. . The automobiles were placed in storage as the property of the Climber Motor Company, and were to remain there until sale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Scarbrough v. AlcornTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pelosi v. BugbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Kimbell Milling Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Whitehead v. ReigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Dunagan v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API