Legal Opinion

Woodside Station Corp. v. Brieger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The findings are not only inconsistent but irreconcilable. We áre, accordingly, bound to accept the findings most favorable to appellant. As such findings are destructive of the judgment, the judgment must be reversed.

The appeal having been taken on the judgment roll as permitted by section 575 of the Civil Practice Act, we have the choice in reversing the judgment either to grant a new trial (Madison County Trust & Deposit Co. v. Smith, 259 N. Y. 348) or to order a reargument upon a complete record (Matter of Small v. Moss, 277 N. Y. 501, 515). In this instance, we are of the view that a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Small v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Madison County Trust & Deposit Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southwestern Shipping Corp. v. AnlyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API