Legal Opinion

Archer & Cosper v. Arnold-Henegar-Doyle Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1916No. 7421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from city court of Carrollton — Judge Beall. February 16, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

1. The suit was upon a note, and the defendant filed an answer at the appearance term. On the trial of the case the defendant offered an amendment to the answer, but the accompanying affidavit failed to state that the new facts or defense set out in the amendment were not omitted for the purpose of delay. This was a fatal defect (Civil Code, § 5640), and the court did not err in sustaining the objection to the amendment. Camp v. Peoples Bank, 11 Ga. App. 724 (76 S. E. 80); Gross v. Whitley, 128 Ga. 79 (57 S. E. 94); Thompson v. Rabun, 131 Ga. 713 (63 S. E. 215).

2. When the amendment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gross v. WhitelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Thompson v. RabunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Camp v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. McMillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API