Legal Opinion

State v. Blume

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1978No. C 75-06-1821 Cr, CA 9861Published

1Per curiam

Defendant on appeal contends that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking defendant’s probation and, secondly, that the trial court erred in failing to require the Corrections Division to furnish it with a presentence report prior to imposing sentence upon revocation.

As for the first assignment, suffice it to say that the revocation of probation was amply supported by the evidence presented. As to the second assignment, the state "concedes that the circuit court erred in failing to require the Corrections Division to furnish a copy of a presentence report prior to imposing sentence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API