Pearsall v. Board of Supervisors
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to review proceedings for discontinuing a, State road. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The plaintiff sued out a writ of certiorari for the purpose of having this Court review the proceedings of the board of supervisors of the county of Eaton in discontinuing a portion of a certain State road in Eaton county, known as the “Lansing and Allegan State Boad.”
The plaintiff contends that the portion of the road so *440discontinued is not a State or territorial road, but is a township road, duly laid out by the township authorities as early as 1840. She sets out in her petition a record of a survey made by the commissioners of highways, dated March 15, 1840, and established as such by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Campau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- People ex rel. Bristol v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- In re the appeals of PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- People ex rel. Goldsmith v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pearsall v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Phillips Mercantile Co. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Weston v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Covert v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.