Legal Opinion

Sulsky v. Horob

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1984No. Civ. 10644PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Delphine Sulsky, appeals from a judgment entered by the district court, Williams County, dismissing her cause of action which sought to rescind, on the basis of fraud, undue influence and mistake, a contract for deed which obligated her to convey certain real property to the defendants, Larry and Lois Horob. We affirm.

Delphine and her first cousin, Larry, “grew up together” on farmsteads a mile and a quarter apart in Williams County. Delphine is the surviving daughter of Estin Sulsky, who died on January 3, 1984, at the age of 90. Estin, prior to his…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Tyler v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hoge v. HogeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Grant v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Thornburg v. PerlebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Erickson v. OlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Lyon v. Ford Motor CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Henry v. HenryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Mandan v. Mi-Jon News, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API