Legal Opinion

Russell Yates v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1985No. 84-2220PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Russell James Yates appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.

Yates was found guilty of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, for which he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, for which he was sentenced to two years imprisonment. See 734 F.2d 368 (8th Cir.1984). Under the authority of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), a special parole term of ten years was also imposed.

Yates contends that the special parole provision of 21…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Kenneth Rich, United States of America v. Larry J. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Walter L. Jones, United States of America v. Calvin BainesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. TebhaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  4. United States v. Ernest SimsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. LockleyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Dana WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Robert BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Barbara Walberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Holloway v. CongerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API