Legal Opinion

Suchan v. Rutherford

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1966No. 9608Published

1Opinion of the Court

410 P.2d 434 (1966)

Anton SUCHAN and Blanche Suchan, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

C. H. RUTHERFORD and Beulah Rutherford, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 9608.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

January 14, 1966.

Rehearing Denied February 7, 1966.

Rayborn, Rayborn & Rayborn, Twin Falls, for appellants.

Hepworth & Nungester, Buhl, for respondents.

TAYLOR, Justice.

In August, 1964, one George Baxter, a real estate agent, interested plaintiffs (appellants) in the purchase of 80 acres of farm land owned by defendants (respondents). August 25, 1964, plaintiffs, with Baxter, drove through…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Idaho-Western Railway Co. v. Columbia Conference of Evangelical Lutheran Augustana SynodIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API