Legal Opinion
Dillingham v. McLaughlin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 7, 1924No. 690 and 691PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The plaintiffs in this case are the president, vice-president and secretary and treasurer, who are also trustees, of the Mutual Benefit League of North America, described in the bill as a common law trust and sometimes denominated plaintiff. The defendants are the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, the Attorney General and the District Attorneys of the same State. The suit is a proceeding in equity brought to prevent the enforcement of an act of the state legislature approved June 1, 1923, Laws of 1923, c. 895, which makes the continuance of the plaintiffs’ business a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Engel v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Denver & Rio Grande R. Co. v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.