Legal Opinion

Tefft v. Sternberg

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia

Decided July 27, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. On bill for injunction and appointment of a receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

SpeiíR, J.

Separate bills were filed by the plaintiffs, citizens of New York, against Sternberg & Loewenherz, an insolvent firm of Columbus, in this district, with averments which, if proven, under repeated decisions of this court, make an unquestionable case for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the assets of the insolvent firm, and to hold them, subject to proper disposition by the final decree of the court, for the satisfaction of the creditors. A temporary injunction having been granted, it appeared on the hearing of the rule to show cause why au injunction proper should not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Davis v. Byers VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Hoskins v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Koplik v. CP Trucking Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. State v. RobinsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API