Commonwealth v. Cook
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
In support of his appeal, Cook relies on Haberek v. Commonwealth, 421 Mass. 1005 (1995), a case in which, without explanation, the court entertained an appeal following the denial of a gatekeeper petition. There, as here, the defendant was represented by the same counsel at trial and on appeal and argued that he could not, therefore, have previously raised his ineffective assistance claim. Id. We decline to follow the Haberek case. The single justice in this case considered Cook’s claims “[concerning the issues underlying *1024[the] claims of ineffective assistance of . . . counsel,” and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AmbersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. EgardoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. HerbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Haberek v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. Quintos Q.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Herbert v. DickhautCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MontoyaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.