Claim of Zimmerman v. Akron Falls Park
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, with costs against the respondents employer and Fund, and the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated in a memorandum: There was substantial medical evidence that claimant suffered a 50% loss of use of his arm attributable solely to the 1967 accident, and this the board properly found, ‘ ‘ in view of the restricted motion of the left shoulder and in spite of the prior left forearm amputation”. Thus, as the dissenters at the Appellate Division correctly concluded : ‘ ‘ The record clearly indicates that the award made to claimant was limited only to the injury…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Bazzano v. John Ryan & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Claim of Pellegrino v. Textile Prints Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Matter of Covington v. New York City Dept. of Corr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Deck v. DorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Deck v. DorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.