Legal Opinion

Claim of Zimmerman v. Akron Falls Park

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with costs against the respondents employer and Fund, and the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated in a memorandum: There was substantial medical evidence that claimant suffered a 50% loss of use of his arm attributable solely to the 1967 accident, and this the board properly found, ‘ ‘ in view of the restricted motion of the left shoulder and in spite of the prior left forearm amputation”. Thus, as the dissenters at the Appellate Division correctly concluded : ‘ ‘ The record clearly indicates that the award made to claimant was limited only to the injury…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claim of Bazzano v. John Ryan & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Claim of Pellegrino v. Textile Prints Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Matter of Covington v. New York City Dept. of Corr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Matter of Deck v. DorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Matter of Deck v. DorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API