Legal Opinion

Rose v. Fague-Prouhet

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1985No. 49614PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Plaintiffs, James and Lillian Rose, appeal judgment for defendant after a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Lori Ann Fague-Prouhet. Plaintiffs sued defendant for personal injuries sustained by James Rose as a result of an automobile collision with defendant. Plaintiff, Lillian Rose, sued for loss of consortium as a result of the collision. This case was tried as one involving comparative negligence of plaintiff James Rose and defendant.

Plaintiffs contend on appeal the trial court erred in: (1) excluding an expert’s opinion of how the collision occurred since the evidence was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Housman v. FiddymentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Keller v. International Harvester Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Cooper v. General Standard, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Yocum v. Kansas City Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Stroud v. GovreauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Delaporte v. Robey Building Supply, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Messina v. PratherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Stucker v. ChitwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Prange v. PrangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Williams v. McCoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API