Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2003No. 49S04-0305-PC-175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

In this appeal the defendant, Mark Thomas, challenges the post-conviction court's rejection of his claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We affirm the denial of post-conviction relief.

In 1997, Thomas was convicted of rape, robbery, and criminal confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed by memorandum decision. Thomas v. State, 700 N.E.2d 513 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (table). Thomas then sought post-conviction relief, which was denied. Disagreeing with the post-conviction court's rejection of Thomas's claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jewell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Henley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API