Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Protective Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1987No. 1011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge;

C. Ed Crosby commenced this action against Protective Life Insurance Company (Protective) for actual and punitive damages for fraud in the issuance of life insurance for his daughter, or in the alternative for reformation of the policy on the basis of mutual mistake. The trial judge granted Protective’s motion for summary judgment on the fraud cause of action. Following a trial, the judge reformed the policy to provide additional death benefits. Protective appeals. We reverse.

Crosby contacted Ronald Keith Williams, a sales agent for Protective, to purchase $50,000.00 life…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sims v. TylerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Shaw v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. CastileCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Crewe v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Orphan Aid Society v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Progressive Max Insurance v. Floating Caps, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. George v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Holmes v. McKayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. George Ex Rel. Estate of George v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API