Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed.

The People raised for the first time at the Appellate Division the specific argument that further neurological testing was not necessary to prove a justification defense. Because this argument is unpreserved, the Appellate Division’s conclusion that County Court abused its discretion in denying authorization for further neurological testing is not reviewable in this Court (see, People v Dodt, 61 NY2d 408, 416). Because this unreviewable ruling forms an independent ground for reversal of the judgment of conviction,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. MawhineyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. People v. MawhineyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. People v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. SteinmetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API