Legal Opinion

Soulé v. Hayward

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

Application for a discharge under a writ of habeas corpus. The defendant was arrested in a civil suit, under the first subdivision of section 74 of the Practice Act., (Statutes of 1850, y>. 435,) which authorizes an arrest *346“ in an action for money received, or property embezzled, or “ fraudulently misapplied, by a public officer, or by an attorney “ or counsellor, or by an officer or agent of a corporation, in the “ course of bis employment as such, or by any factor, agent, “ broker, or other person in a fiduciary capacity.” The affidavit, upon which the order of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ledford v. Emerson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Gray Bros. v. Blasingame TurwilligerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API