Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Heckscher

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an order made at a special term, vacating an order of arrest.

1Opinion of the CourtClerks, J.

The following rule, if not invariably, has very generally, been recognized and approved. When the facts constituting the cause of action, and authorizing the arrest, are the same, a motion to vacate an order of arrest will be denied, unless there is a very decided preponderance of evidence of the defendant, upon the motion, or unless the facts show clearly that the plaintiff has no cause of action. The questions brought before the court on the motion, being issues in the cause, the jury alone, except in the instances mentioned, should pass upon them at the trial. This is the rule exemplified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frost v. M'CargerNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Ely v. MumfordNew York Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griswold v. SweetNew York Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API