Legal Opinion

Marcelyn Bazelin Trust v. McCandless International Trucks, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1992No. 22145Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The issue presented on appeal is whether real property which is the subject of an exercised lease-purchase option should be valuated as if it were encumbered by an extension of the leasehold term that was not effectuated by the optionee. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the purchase price should be valuated as unencumbered by any lease extension.

*342 Facts

The parties are successors in interest of parties to a lease of real property. Appellants (“Bazlen”)1 succeeded in interest to the owners/lessors of the real property. Respondent McCandless International Trucks, Inc.,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Palm Pavilion of Clearwater v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Great American Airways, Inc. v. Airport AuthorityNevada Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API