Legal Opinion

James v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 17, 1930No. J-260PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Defendant has demurred to the petition in this case on the ground that under section 284 (d) of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 1065 (d), this court is without jurisdiction to entertain this suit because, prior to the institution thereof, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue mailed to the plaintiff a notice of a deficiency in respect of the tax for 1919, and the plaintiff instituted a proceeding before the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

From the record it appears that for the calendar year 1919 plaintiff paid a tax of $2,031,853.73, and subsequently, on March 6, 1926,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Bindley v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  2. Brampton Woolen Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  3. Warren Mfg. Co. v. TaitDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1932
  4. American Woolen Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  5. Green v. MacLaughlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API