Legal Opinion

Meza v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 10, 1987No. 13-85-558-CRPublishedCited by 609 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a handgun. The jury assessed punishment at 30 days in jail and probated this term.

Appellant gave pro se notice of appeal. There is no indication in the record that appellant is indigent. No statement of facts or briefs have been filed.

When the periods for filing the statement of facts and briefs expired, this Court, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 74(/)(2), abated the appeal for the trial court to determine if appellant wished to pursue his appeal, if he was indigent, if appointed counsel was required, or if retained…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Roblow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

4Cited by609 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  3. Sutherland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. Alakhras v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Aaron Anthony Broich v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013

604 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API