Legal Opinion

Minyard v. Daking Mill, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1980No. 80-74PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The trial court directed a verdict for the appellee at the close of the appellant’s presentation in a suit for damages alleged to have been caused by appellee’s breach of an employment contract with appellant.

Appellant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for a directed verdict. We agree.

Appellant had been employed by appellee as secretary-treasurer for 24 years until May 12, 19J8, when the stockholders voted to accept her resignation. At the same meeting the stockholders passed a resolution directing the officers of the corporation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harper v. Mo. Pac. Rd. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Gatling v. GoodgameSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Johnston v. Ms. Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McIlroy Bank & Trust Co. v. LaVonne ComstockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API