State v. Muhammad
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Naji Muhammad, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) allowed facts concerning two prior convictions of the defendant to be admitted into evidence and (2) precluded certain evidence of the victim’s prior assault of a third party. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On February 10, 2001, the defendant was at home in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. VelezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. CamachoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- State v. SwillingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.