Legal Opinion

State v. Muhammad

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 20, 2005No. AC 24536PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendant, Naji Muhammad, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) allowed facts concerning two prior convictions of the defendant to be admitted into evidence and (2) precluded certain evidence of the victim’s prior assault of a third party. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On February 10, 2001, the defendant was at home in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VelezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. State v. CamachoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  4. State v. SwillingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API