Commonwealth v. Sluss
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
The Commonwealth appeals, pursuant to Code § 19.2-398, from a trial court order that suppressed statements made by Scott Ray Sluss to agents of the Commonwealth and the evidence derived from those statements. The basis for the trial judge’s ruling was that the statements were involuntary because they were induced by a promise of immunity from the Commonwealth’s attorney that was later retracted in violation of Sluss’s fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. We affirm the decision of the trial judge, but for a reason different than his finding that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Driscoll v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Eason v. EasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- United States v. Michael BrittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crowder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Hood v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Lampkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Marion v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sandy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.