Legal Opinion

Poorsina v. Zhang

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 2021No. 3:20-cv-09119Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALI POORSINA, 7 Case No. 20-cv-09119-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO 9 DISMISS XIAOSONG ZHANG, et al., 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Ali Poorsina, proceeding pro se, has filed a “Complaint for Cancellation of a 15 Security Instrument, to Quiet Title and Punitive Damages” (“Complaint”) naming as defendants 16 Samuel Wang, Xiaosong Zhang and Meng Li. Defendants Zhang and Li, who are husband and 17 wife, bring a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API