Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Sammons

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 15, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

’Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. H. Bank, Judge. Garnishment proceedings to subject an amount due from Taber Lumber Company to defendant Sammons to the payment of a judgment held by plaintiff against said Sammons. Both defendant and the garnishee claimed that the debt was exempt from execution. The trial court denied the exemption, and the garnishee and the defendant appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.

These two cases have a very unusual history. The amount involved is very small, yet this is the third time the case has been before us. See 139 Iowa, 64, and 119 N. W. 690, for opinions in former appeals. Each time the case has come here the record has been obscure, and the situation difficult to understand. This time there are numerous amendments to abstracts, mxftions, and additional arguments, tending to obscure rather than to clarify, and we shall have much difficulty in stating the case. Before going to the exact point involved, it is well to say that none of the motions filed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolan v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Simmons v. DolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Brainard v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank Mason City v. LarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Citizens Bank v. Scott SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Citizens Bank v. C. F. Scott & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Emery v. LeightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API