D.R. ex rel. L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Dissent
SLOVITER, Chief Judge,
dissenting, with whom MANSMANN, SCIRICA and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges, join.
The majority opinion is based on the premise that the types of relationships which can give rise to a constitutional duty of a state to protect its school children from harm from third parties is mandated by the Supreme Court’s opinion in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs., 489 U.S. 189, 109 S.Ct. 998, 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989). I believe that is too narrow a reading of DeShaney, and that the scope of the Due Process Clause’s duty to protect, while limited, extends beyond the narrow…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.