Legal Opinion

Warren v. Fink

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1937No. 33,682; No. 33,683; No. 33,684PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Haevey, J.:

These are three separate mandamus proceedings briefed and argued together, brought originally in this court, in which the respective plaintiffs seek orders requiring defendants to accept as correct, returns made' by them under our recent sales-tax act (Laws 1937, ch. 374). This is an act providing for a tax upon the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail. Generally speaking, it levies and provides for the collection and disbursement of a tax at the rate of two percent upon the sales of tangible personal property made to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wiseman v. Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. White Motor Co. v. LittletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Fischer Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Central Surety & Ins. Corporation v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API