Legal Opinion
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Township of Berkeley Heights
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 17, 2010No. A-95 September Term 2008Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
989 A.2d 844 (2010)
201 N.J. 237
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HEIGHTS, Defendant-Respondent.
A-95 September Term 2008.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 14, 2009.
Decided March 17, 2010.
Michael James Guerriero, Florham Park, argued the cause for appellant (Day Pitney, attorneys; Mr. Guerriero and Christopher John Stracco, on the brief).
Saul A. Wolfe, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys; Mr. Wolfe and David B. Wolfe, of counsel; Saul A. Wolfe, David B. Wolfe, and Edward J. Kuch, III, on the brief).
2Opinion of the Court · HoensJustice Hoens
In this…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Albin; Concurrence · Rivera-Soto.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Paulison Ave. Assoc. v. Passaic CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999
- Great Adventure, Inc. v. Township of JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Township of Berkeley HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.