Legal Opinion

Venezian v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on January 9, 1990, which, inter alia, denied petitioners’ application for leave to amend their notice of claim, is unanimously dismissed as superceded by the appeal from the order of June 19, 1990, without costs or disbursements.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on June 19, 1990, which denied petitioners’ motion to reargue and renew their prior application is unanimously reversed on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of granting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krug v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seise v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Sokolowski v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Puertas v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Copeland v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API