Legal Opinion · Dissent

HORTON B/N/F NELSON v. Sater

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1966No. 20,395Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Mote, P.J.

— The majority opinion and decision herein appears to be predicated upon alleged error of the trial court in the giving of appellee’s tendered Instructions Numbers 5, 8 and 20, which are as follows:

“Instruction No. 5. The defense of contributory negligence is an issue in this case.
“Instruction No. 8. The plaintiff was under a duty to give her driver a timely warning of any approaching danger *6which she saw or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have seen when it appeared that her driver was unaware of such approaching danger.
“Instruction No. 20. The law of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. HORTON B/N/F NELSON v. SaterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Gurczak v. HutterIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ralfe Kaminski v. Chester MeadowsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API