Legal Opinion · Dissent
HORTON B/N/F NELSON v. Sater
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1966No. 20,395Published
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Mote, P.J.
— The majority opinion and decision herein appears to be predicated upon alleged error of the trial court in the giving of appellee’s tendered Instructions Numbers 5, 8 and 20, which are as follows:
“Instruction No. 5. The defense of contributory negligence is an issue in this case.
“Instruction No. 8. The plaintiff was under a duty to give her driver a timely warning of any approaching danger *6which she saw or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have seen when it appeared that her driver was unaware of such approaching danger.
“Instruction No. 20. The law of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- HORTON B/N/F NELSON v. SaterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gurczak v. HutterIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Ralfe Kaminski v. Chester MeadowsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959