Mohawk Motor, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The transcript of the testimony, the exhibits, and briefs of counsel present a rather voluminous collection of documents. It is not the purpose of this opinion to weigh the evidence or to substitute the judgment of this court for that of the commission on. factual matters but rather to determine from *246the entire record if the findings and order of the commission are reasonable and lawful.
Appellant contends that the report of the examiner (made a part of the findings and order of the commission) discloses grievous error in certain of its conclusions drawn from the evidence. The following is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lake Shore Electric Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Erie Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Central Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Zanesville-Columbus Red Star Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ohio Bus Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972