Legal Opinion

Nottingham Village v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1992No. 2635 C.D. 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Nottingham Village (Nottingham) appeals from a final order of the Acting Secretary of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW), that affirmed the decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals’ adoption of an Attorney Examiner’s determination, denying in part and sustaining in part1 Nottingham’s *180appeal from audit adjustments of Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid) reimbursement allowances. We affirm.

Nottingham is a nursing facility provider enrolled in Pennsylvania’s Medical Assistance Program. As a member of this program, Nottingham undergoes DPW audits that examine, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Fair Winds Manor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Grandview Health Homes, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Suburban Manor/Highland Hall Care Center v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Segal v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API