Legal Opinion · Dissent

Absentee Ballots Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1966No. Appeals, 154 and 155Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones:

My study of the issues involved on these appeals compels the conclusion that the majority of this Court err in deciding that the scope of permissible appellate review in this case is on narrow certiorari. Having so decided, the majority of this Court — having found the court below had jurisdiction, that the proceedings were regular, that there was no excession of powers nor a violation of any constitutional right— refused to inquire into the merits of the controversy. If the majority is correct that the instant scope of review is on narrow certiorari,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Perles v. Northumberland County Return BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Cullen AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Meell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Fitch AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API